Nettet1. jul. 2012 · A seminal event in the modern history of debate over intentionalism was the publication of W.K. Wimsatt’s and Monroe Beardsley’s “The Intentional Fallacy” in 1946. 2 It is generally taken to articulate a distinguishing belief of the New Criticism in the irrelevance to criticism of external evidence, such as evidence about an author’s life, … Nettet24. des. 2010 · William Kurtz Wimsatt (1907 – 75) and Monroe Curtis Beardsley (1915 – 85) are best known for their co-authorship of “The intentional fallacy” and “The affective fallacy,” essays that articulate what have come to be considered the fundamental tenets of the American New Criticism.

New Criticism: Intentional Fallacy, Affective Fallacy, Heresy of ...

NettetThe Intentional Fallacy Who determines what a work of art means? Its audience? Art historians or critics? Some people assert that it is the intention of the artist that determines the meaning of the work of art. fancy nancy games for kids

JAIC 1996, Volume 35, Number 3, Article 3 (pp. 197 to 218)

NettetIntentional Fallacy tells that the relationship between a text and its audience is independent of the author’s presence. It liberates the act of readership from the omniscience of the author. Affective Fallacy. Wimsatt brought forward another theory which was called “Affective Fallacy”. NettetWilliam Kurtz Wimsatt Jr. (November 17, 1907 – December 17, 1975) was an American professor of English, literary theorist, and critic. Wimsatt is often associated with the concept of the intentional fallacy, which he developed with Monroe Beardsley in order to discuss the importance of an author's intentions for the creation of a work of art. [1] NettetA separate but concurrent debate among philosophers, art critics, and literary critics was sparked by publication of “The Intentional Fallacy,” a scholarly article discrediting appeals to the intentions of artists and authors in art and literary criticism. fancy nancy gift wrap