WebThe test is “whether or not in behalf of one client, it is the lawyer's duty to fight for an issue or claim, but it is his duty to oppose it for the other client. (cited Hornilla v. Salunat, 2003) Canon 16, Rules 16.01 and 16.03 AC. No. 10438 September 23, 2014 CF SHARP CREW MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED v. WebThree tests were provided in the Hornilla v. Salunat ruling in determining whether or not there is conflict of interests: whether or not in behalf of one client, it is the lawyer's duty to fight for an issue or claim, but it is his duty to oppose it for the other client. In brief, if he
Digest HORNILLA VS. SALUNAT- A.C. No. 5804 - Philippine Law
WebCASE TITLE: 18. Hornilla vs. Salunat GR NO/DATE: A.C. No. 5804 July 1, 2003 Facts: Benedicto Hornilla is a member of the Philippine Public School Teachers Association (PPSTA). Along with several other complainants, Hornilla filed intra- corporate cases before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) against WebJul 1, 2003 · Benedicto Hornilla and Atty. Federico Ricafort vs. Atty. Ernesto Salunat A.C. No. 5804 July 1, 2003 Facts: Benedicto Hornilla is a member of the Philippine Public … resume kiss trousers
Hornilla vs Salunat - PALE Full - A. No. 5804. July 1, …
WebIn Hornilla v. Atty. Salunat, 15 the Court explained that there is conflict of interest when a lawyer represents inconsistent interests of two or more opposing parties. ... (2003). 16 Dr. Lee v. Atty. Simando, 710 Phil. 600,607 (2013). 17 Rosacia v. Bulalacao, 3 I 9 Phil I, 4 (I 995). 18 Romero v. Evangelista, Jr., A.C. No. 11829, 26 February ... WebOn November 21, 1997, Benedicto Hornilla and Federico D. Ricafort filed an administrative complaint 1 with the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) Commission on Bar … prue leith health